Nuclear Ireland?

Date: | 1978 |
---|---|
Authors: | Carole Craig, Matthew Hussey |
View: | View Document |
Discuss: | Comments on this document |
Subjects: | Nuclear Energy |
Please note: The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to The Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to The Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.
Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution
30th November 2009
This is a document, and many thanks to Jim Monaghan for forwarding it, that to some extent runs at a tangent to much of the Archive. But it is without question that in the mid to late 1970s campaigns and activism developed that were centered on issues beyond socialism as such or the North and foreshadowed social campaigns and the rise of the environmental movement and its political face in the Ecology Party and later the transition of that organisation to a Green Party. However, that said, the left in all its forms was involved in the campaign to prevent the arrival of commercial nuclear power on our shores. The Fianna Fáil government had produced a Green Paper on energy, ‘Energy-Ireland, Discussion Document on some Current Energy Problems and Options’.
Indeed the book is explicit in noting that it ‘looks at these opposing views [on nuclear energy] and many others - in the context of the nuclear power station now being considered for Carnsore Point in County Wexford’. Written by Dr. Matthew Hussey of Kevin St. College of Technology and Carole Craig, a journalist, the quote on the back of the pamphlet indicates the approach taken within:
Fission energy is safe only if a number of critical devices work as they should, if a number of people in key positions follow all their instructions, if there is no sabotage, no hijacking of the transports, if no reactor fuel processing plant or repository anywhere in the world is situated in a region of riots, or guerilla activity, and no revolution or war - even a ‘conventional one’ - takes place in these regions. The enormous quantities of extremely dangerous materail must not get into the hands of ignorant people or desperadoes. No acts of God can be permitted. Hans Alfren, Nobel Laureate
Inside it deals with the science of nuclear energy, safety issues, aspects of the econmics of nuclear power and the political ramifications. It also discusses alternatives. Throughout it is illustrated by Martyn Turner cartoons and strips. It’s actually quite a snappy read and very evocative of the period within which it was produced. Odd to reflect that as recently as this last week, John Gormley was arguing that the nuclear option while not his choice was not something that he would dismiss out of hand.
On a further tangent to this topic there’s some illuminating material inside the Lost Revolution on the agonising within SFWP on the issue of nuclear technology.
Comments
No Comments yet.
Add a Comment
Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:
**Bold text**
Bold text
_Italic text_
Italic text
[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link
You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution
By: Carole Craig Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:17:04
In reply to WorldbyStorm.
Sorry don’t have any comments except that it is wonderful there is such an archive and that it is important to push energy solutions which do repeat the pattern of corporate control which I what I believe nuclear power is very much about.
Reply on the CLR
By: Carole Craig Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:17:50
In reply to WorldbyStorm.
Whoops DO NOT REPAT it should have read
Reply on the CLR
By: WorldbyStorm Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:24:11
In reply to WorldbyStorm.
I tend to the same viewpoint. In extremis, well perhaps then we have to see, but we’re not in extremis yet.
Reply on the CLR
By: yourcousin Sun, 05 Sep 2010 03:30:02
Would love to see a post about energy consumption and our (respective) societies.
Reply on the CLR
By: WorldbyStorm Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:36:26
In reply to yourcousin.
Hmmm… Pope Epopt?
Reply on the CLR
By: Jim Monaghan Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:38:19
On agonising, everyones favourite loony group the Spartacists are pro nuclear power. I would guess that Smullen was as well. Given the safety record in the USSR was much worse than in the USA one would wonder
Reply on the CLR
By: rebel Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:28:39
In reply to Jim Monaghan.
Smullen was against the American model of Nuclear Power Stations. He favored the Russian type ( true story).
Around the same time Smullen was championing Zeppelins ( Goodyear) to to keep an eye on our fishing beds.
Reply on the CLR