The Starry Plough
| Date: | 1973 |
|---|---|
| Organisation: | Sinn Féin [Official] |
| Publication: | The Starry Plough [Derry] |
| Issue: | [Un-numbered] |
| Collection: | Music in the Irish Left Archive |
| Type: | Publication Issue |
| View: | View Document |
| Discuss: | Comments on this document |
| Subjects: |
Please note: The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to The Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to The Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.
Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution
15th March 2010
The Starry Plough was the newspaper of Official Sinn Féin in Derry ‘Derry’s own Republican newspaper’ as the subheading had it. This edition is of particular importance since it dates from just after the OIRA ceasefire of 1972. The front page is entitled Army Council Sees Growing Danger of Civil War: Why Officials Called A Halt.
The leading article argues that “The decision by the Official IRA to suspend offensive military activity was taken after weeks of consultation with the Executive of the Republican Clubs. It was not influenced in any way by the hypocrites of the ‘peace at any price’ bandwagon. It was clear to us that the violence in the North, if it continued as it had been doing, could lead only to a sectarian war, a war between Catholics and Protestants which would be of no benefit whatever to the working class. That was the single most important reason for the decision”.
Despite the ceasefire the paper takes a combative tone throughout, from a photograph on the front cover alleging that a soldier is ‘Soldier F’ from the Widgery Report on Bloody Sunday to the general approach of articles.
The editorial argues that ‘we will fight repression whether it is in the north or the south’, but it is clear that this will be on political grounds.
The problems of pursuing such a purely political approach are highlighted by a small piece on the back page: The Derry Official Republican Movement regrets the deaths of Vol. John Starrs and young Manus Deery, murdered by the forces of British repression. We tender our sincerest sympathy to their family and friends. Perhaps of particular interest is the centre spread, with an accompanying photograph of Cathal Goulding in Free Derry, which has an article on ‘Communism, the Church and the IRA’ and seeks to counter charges from some clergy that the Official IRA ‘are not really the IRA at all. They are just communists putting themselves forward as the IRA…’ And the article continues later ‘We have no intention of running away from these allegations. There are Marxists in the Official Republican Movement. We DO want to overthrow capitalism. If, because of that people want to call us ‘Reds’ then so be it. As an Irish Socialist put it some years ago ‘I’d rather be called a Red by a rat, than a rat by a Red’. Connolly was a Marxist. He said so’.
More from The Starry Plough [Derry]
The Starry Plough [Derry] in the archive
Comments
No Comments yet.
Add a Comment
Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:
**Bold text**
Bold text
_Italic text_
Italic text
[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link
You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution
By: liam ó comáin Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:11:46
In The Footsteps Of Tone
It once was said that from the dead there would spring living people and from the dead of ages past came children of true mettle…
I shared their enthusiasm from the age of twelve, their dream was my dream, their methods were my methods; rationally and affectively I was convinced that I was in the right- not in an ideological sense but one sanctioned by our heritage.
In pursuit of the cause all means were considered legitimate which helped to realize our objective; a course destined to brutalise the most sensitive and cultured; death was but a dream and we laughed at imprisonment.By reading the works of Pearse and ’The Wolfe Tone Annual’ we refuelled our motivation, thinking not of ourselves but that great other- ’the people’ ; yet, we treaded the minefield of possible elitism, and there were those who aspired to such an egotistical steeple.
In the 1950s we witnessed another ’glorious failure’: the odds were insurmountable, the courage and sacrifices were great; yet the failure of the campaign led to a new departure- the movement was destined for a ‘left-wing’ fate.Connolly and Marx were quoted, if not digested, at meetings; in content ’The United Irishman’ was radically transformed;even Bodenstown re-echoed to the quotes of Mao and Lenin;the bastille of imperialism was soon to be stormed.
Civil rights agitation was an aspect of the new strategy,non- violence was nurturing the revolutionary seed.But the ghosts of tradition were close in attendance to sway those who rejected the ’socialist mead’.Once more the movement for freedom and separatism shared the tradition of a political split; the ’stickies’ and ’pinheads’ were new connotations each contending that the other was not legitimate.
Both pursued their objectives with different strategies,engendering a hatred which drove them further apart.Even to the extent of mutual assassinations, a continual breaking of the republican heart.Within both strategies there were apparent weaknesses.In implementation certain aspects were premature.An under-presumption of the sectarian problem,and the attempt at populace education was poor.The phenomenon of non-violence and then of violence twisted the face of northern politics; extending beyond the confines of ’the border’ and fuelling the conviction that ’Ireland was in a fix’.In the aftermath of such historical changes: the faceless ones bade welcome to the confusion and despair; the innocent suffered at the hands of loyalist, Brit’, and republican; a community broken and perhaps beyond repair.And even some who advocated the road of the ’ballot’ neglected to serve the war-weary community; by pursuing selfish, petty, and sectarian objectives, their actions reeking of blatant dishonesty. Their behaviour similar to the hypocrisy of the southern political powers that be.
Thus within the shadow of ’Britain’s Vietnam’ I sometimes wonder are we on the path of Tone? Does our dream of dreams justify ’Teebane’ so we Irish can rule ourselves alone? No, no, no, no,…! And does the life of one brave ’hunger-striker’, weigh less than the idea of The Republic we proclaim? Can the bullet co-exist with the ballot or in our society are they equally the same?
Within a poem a poet wrote:- ’A Terrible beauty is born’, but alas that beauty is all maimed.
Is there no rose without a thorn?
Liam Ó Comáin
Reply on the CLR
By: Liam Ó Comáin Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:27:17
In reply to liam Ó Comáin.
The Following letter was received by many Irish newspapers but was not published.The letter was sent to McG at Stormont and his home address in Derry.But no replies.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
An Open Letter To Martin McGuinness From Derry Veteran Republican, Liam O’Comain
Dear Martin,
Please consider my letter as a reply to your recent outbursts against the so called ‘dissidents’. To be called a ‘traitor’ by you because of my opposition alongside others to the Belfast Agreement is my reason for seeking the democratic right of reply to your allegations. Your statements came to my notice via the media and I seek via the media to respond.
I was a full-time organiser for the Republican Movement when you joined the IRA and I am aware that you remained with the so called ‘Officials’ (as I did) for well over three months after the Fianna Fail orchestrated split of the Movement.
Indeed as you will recall the postponement of a proposed military operation under the auspices of the Derry City IRA Brigade was the reason for your departure to the then fledgling Provo Movement.
Since then you projected the image of yourself as a ‘militarist A1’; and in due course contending that the Provo military wing fought the British Army to a standstill. But now contending that the best replacement for physical force as a means of uniting Ireland is (in spite of the guaranteed continuation of partition) the Belfast Agreement. What a paradox , Martin, when one recalls other paradoxical aspects of your behaviour. To mention one other that is the interview that Anthony McIntyre, a former Provo prisoner, had with Sean MacStiofain, the first Provo Chief of Staff. Sean Mac’ said that you personally had lobbied for a ceasefire as early as 1972. Why, Martin? Surely at this stage the Provos had not fought the ‘occupiers to a standstill‘!
Is it feasible that a person could proclaim that the fight (primarily physical force) for national self determination will ‘go on until the end’, that is, until the goal of Irish national freedom is achieved, and then within a matter of years do a complete turn and enthusiastically play one’s part in preventing the freedom of our country by becoming a minister in an anti-democratic system, an assembly established as the bulwark against the realisation of a successful ‘end’?
Thus, is it possible that the anti-insurgency ideas of the British military strategist, namely Kitson, were successfully realised via the Provos, especially that of nurturing a number of volunteers with the potential to become leaders, in other words infiltrating paid informers into leadership roles of an alleged revolutionary movement for the intention of steering that movement into an entirely different direction or defeat?
The revelations that Denis Donaldson, Provo Sinn Fein head of administration at Stormont, and Freddie Scappaticci, the Provo IRA’s deputy head of security, were both in the pay of the British have left many prepared to believe the worst of the Provo leadership including yourself.
Obviously you are aware of the newspaper claims by Martin Ingram, a former military intelligence officer, that you were controlled by MI6 for at least two decades. In fact via the media Ingram challenged yourself to a public debate about his allegations. That, if it had taken place, would have offered you a golden opportunity to refute such damaging allegations but apparently you refused to engage publicly with the M16 agent. Which is puzzling behaviour in response to the allegation that you like our fellow citizen Raymond Gilmore was a super- grass. Also a retired RUC special branch officer was reported via the media to believe that you were an MI5 agent code-named “Fisherman”, though others maintain that this agent may have been a person close to you.
And there is other media reports, Martin, that puzzles many about aspects of matters relating to you in the light of such serious allegations. In November 1994 a police investigation, Operation Taurus, found three witnesses to implicate you in ‘directing terrorism‘. It was halted with the appearance of a letter asking prosecutors to bear in mind that you would shortly be in talks with the British government about the future of the occupied 6 counties.
I recall the statements by another British agent, Robert Quigley, implicating you in organising Provo activity, but you were never charged. Yes, you appear to have had a “charmed existence”, Martin, and arising from it answers are required. And with such un-answered questions relating to you (and I have more) what right have you to call opponents of the Belfast Agreement ‘traitors’.
Awaiting your reply.
Liam O’Comain,
Reply on the CLR
By: midulsterirsp Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:37:58
In reply to Jim Monaghan.
Hi Jim, is this history still being written?
Reply on the CLR
By: Liam Ó Comáin Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:04:22
A Dissident
I am a dissident-
Well that’s what
I have been labelled.
Of course the reason
Behind the labelling
Is because I support
The idea that all nations
Should self-determine
Their own futures.
Which implies none
Interference from any
Other country…
Alas,that lack of justice
In Ireland has generated
Over and over dissent
And,alas,the non-existence
Of ‘peace’….
Reply on the CLR
By: canice doherty Sat, 29 Jun 2013 14:24:02
In reply to Jim Monaghan.
A Review By Canice Doherty
Of-
In Pursuit Of Peace In Ireland.
The Memoirs and Thoughts
Of An Irish Revolutionary Republican.
By Liam Ó Comáin
~
This review relates to a recent publication by a person who when we met was more reserved than other’s I have encountered who have experienced involvement in what has been termed ‘the troubles’ in the north of our island. The author is the Limavady poet, Liam Ó Comáin, who now resides in Derry City with his wife and family. Now, only recently meeting the author although aware of his existence this book is a valuable contribution to the history of the period and to the author’s central role in it.
The author, was one of the leaders of the movement for what he alleges was revolutionary change in Ireland in the last 50 years of the 20th century leading into the early years of the present millennium. An ex-full time organiser for the Irish Republican Movement he as organiser was one of the founders of the Civil Rights Association and in later years the Irish National Chairperson of the Irish Republican Socialist Party. In the latter-The Irish Republican Socialist Movement- he also held the position of organiser.
As a person of principle he strongly opposed the formation of the so-called ‘Provisional Republican Movement’. Being a strict adherent of allegiance to the all-Ireland Republic proclaimed in 1916 and declared in 1918. At present he is not associated with any political grouping.
An ex-graduate of the University of Ulster he has published articles and books on mysticism, politics, pigeon racing, and poetry in-spite of health problems as he traverses his aging seventies.
As for this book’s contents I discovered much re those decades, although my ear was close to the ground during them, that I was not aware of. In fact some aspects of this book’s contents are required to ensure that history as it happened will have to be corrected by some authors of the period written about. Now, although I am a nationalist and not a republican, having come through the period which the contents refer too I must emphasise the point that the author apparently provides the truth which others have twisted and neglected for one reason or another. Of course there are aspects that I question but I assume for legal reasons the author could not confirm further.
In fact there are some startling revelations about the period and about some of the participants. There is no hold back in criticism re others of the political establishment in Ireland, north and south, including references to the Stormont Establishment and even America and the EU.
As a believer in the contention that the basis of peace is justice the author strongly argues
on behalf of the latter and is opposed to the concept that peace at any price is the way forward.
An interesting contribution to the modern history of Ireland and the author concludes by offering the non- Catholic minority a blueprint of a possible way forward – a future which he believes
is required for our peoples welfare and which could lay the basis for a more peaceful world.
The book also includes a selection of poetry relating to the subject of republicanism.
+
In Pursuit Of Peace In Ireland
(Priced: £13-30 Sterling and E16-90)
is published by united P.C.publisher
c/o Hamilton House,
Mabledon Place,
Bloomsbury,
London, WC 1H 9BB,
England.
It can also be obtained from the publishers international internet site and other internet sites including ‘Amazon’ as well as book distributors and bookshops.
Reply on the CLR
By: canice doherty Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:57:16
In reply to canice doherty.
Thank you Canice for the review.Many are interested!!!Going well.
Reply on the CLR
By: Liam Ó Comáin Tue, 30 Dec 2014 15:10:15
Prior to death James Connolly received the Blessed Eucharist.
Reply on the CLR