Northern Ireland Assembly Election Manifesto, 2003

Date: | 2003 |
---|---|
Organisation: | Progressive Unionist Party |
Type: | Manifesto |
View: | View Document |
Discuss: | Comments on this document |
Subjects: | Northern Ireland Assembly Election, 2003 |
Please note: The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to The Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to The Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.
Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution
17th May 2010
Well, here’s a first for the Archive, and perhaps something that will be seen as a little contentious. But if not explicitly socialist, at least not self-ascribed in the context of this document, the Progressive Unionist Party could, with some legitimacy, be regarded as the most leftwards force in contemporary Unionism and therefore worthy of inclusion in the Archive.
This document is the PUP Manifesto for the 2003 Northern Ireland Assembly elections. This was the second election to this body and saw the PUP lose one seat with only David Ervine being returned. It’s an interesting document that is quite short. An introduction from David Ervine that strongly reemphasises the unionist credentials of the party…
Division over Pro and Anti Agreement views has left our community with nothing but low morale. Today those divisions should be behind us. The position of the Progressive Unionist Party is as ever Pro Union. We have a clear vision for the future of Northern Ireland within the Union and a definitive strategy to drive that vision.
That said it also is explicit in recognising distinctions between the communities in terms of identity and identification…
To create a positive and progressive future in Northern Ireland I believe we need to focus on the two core issues of respect for our different national, political and cultural identities and the political legacy we will pass onto future generations. The issue of respect is especially pertinent to the Unionist population at present. They feel that the Unionist identity is not being given the respect that it deserves. I believe they are right. As a committed Unionist myself I have always been proud of my community. Our national, political and cultural character is the result of centuries of experience and thought and thus, as I respect the identities of others, so I expect it in return. In the Progressive Unionist Party we believe that our future will be brighter when all politicians recognise and respect our differences. And it is my conviction that diverse identities will become a positive feature of a truly multicultural Northern Ireland.
It’s a little disappointing that there is very little explicit expression of left wing thinking or the terms ‘left’ or ‘social democrat’, let alone socialist - although it is notable that the term ‘working class’ is used in the text (and their website is less coy ). In policy terms the closest it comes to this is the following:
The Progressive Unionist Party repudiates the values and ethos of the new right who seek to privatise the welfare state. We oppose the handing over of our future to PPP/PFI and unaccountable ‘Trusts’. We do not trust these bodies and thus we call for: • Properly funded services directly governed by elected local authorities. • Services that are geared to facilitate community needs and not limited to the needs of stigmatised individuals. • Local community social work teams and Family Centres as the main base for social welfare activity. • Social policies that are geared towards equipping families and individuals with the resources and information to enable them to take control of their lives. • An end to managerial social work and the overthrow of contract culture. • An increase in the benefits for lone parents.
The list of candidates is particularly notable for the linkages to the voluntary and community sectors.
Many thanks to the person who forwarded this to the Archive.
More from Progressive Unionist Party
Progressive Unionist Party in the archive
Comments
No Comments yet.
Add a Comment
Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:
**Bold text**
Bold text
_Italic text_
Italic text
[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link
You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution
By: yourcousin Tue, 18 May 2010 10:51:31
In reply to Garibaldy.
G,
perhaps not quite as simple, but not much more complicated either. Dawn squeeked in last time on Ervines legacy and the next election will tell whether or not she can make it on her own. Does she have a constituency to answer to? Most certainly. But it is a niche coonstituency which is heavily reliant on transfers from Alliance and the softer UUP vote as you mentioned. I think that if the PUP was going in the other direction and had a growing presence you’d see a hardening up of some attitudes and moderating of others, that’s all.
Reply on the CLR
By: EamonnCork Tue, 18 May 2010 11:01:16
In reply to sonofstan.
But surely there’s no comparison between East and West Belfast. After all it’s not as if the TD for West Belfast has been implicated in a scandal caused by the sexual misbehaviour of one of his family.
Reply on the CLR
By: sonofstan Tue, 18 May 2010 11:49:51
In reply to EamonnCork.
There’s a TD for West Belfast?! Have I woken up in United Ireland?
Reply on the CLR
By: EamonnCork Tue, 18 May 2010 12:00:32
In reply to sonofstan.
You mean you didn’t hear this morning’s news?
Freudian slip perhaps.
Reply on the CLR
By: sonofstan Tue, 18 May 2010 12:13:19
In reply to EamonnCork.
You mean you didn’t hear this morning’s news?
There was no news: just the Army No 1 band playing Amhrain Na bhFiann over and over again….
Reply on the CLR
By: EamonnCork Tue, 18 May 2010 12:15:33
In reply to EamonnCork.
That was on radio. On telly they ran an endless loop of the Wolfe Tones doing A Nation Once Again at Siamsa Cois Laoi in 1977.
Reply on the CLR
By: Garibaldy Tue, 18 May 2010 12:20:28
In reply to EamonnCork.
No wonder the unionists don’t want a united Ireland if this is what we’ll all be subjected to
Reply on the CLR