Advance, No. 24
Date:1976
Organisation: Socialist Party of Ireland [1970]
Publication: Advance
Issue:Number 24
November—December 1976
Type:Publication Issue
View: View Document
Discuss:Comments on this document
Subjects:

Please note:  The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to The Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners. If documents provided to The Irish Left Archive have been created for or added to other online archives, please inform us so sources can be credited.

Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution

21st October 2024

This is a welcome addition to the materials produced by the Socialist Party of Ireland already in the Archive. This eight page edition of their newspaper Advance is very characteristic of the publication.

The headlines on the front page are ‘Expand state sector into productive industry’ and ‘Peace Campaign’.

The first notes:

After 55 YEARS in existence, the Irish capita.list state has proved its failure to meet the needs of the people, Over 100,000 unemployed, High prices and inflation, the lowest wage levels in the EEC, housing shortages and limited social serv­ices, provide graphic evidence of this failure. Prime Minister Cosgrave, a leading spokesman for Capitalist interests has publicly admitted this failure in recent speeches. But the solutions he pro­poses to the current crisis are the same old failed policies of the pres­ent and past capitalist governments. In doing this, he dogmatically rules out any possibility of structural changes in the ecmomy which would allow a new lnitative by state financ­ed, democratically controlled enter­prises, to develop the economy in the interests of the majority of the population. There are state enterprises which have had commercial success such as Bord Na Mona and Aer Lingus, but they a re prevented from expand-ing into any area which might lead to competition with ‘free enter­prise’ and most of their profits go to the banking monopolies as interest on loans and loan repayments . The role of the Public Sector, now as in the past has been one of support and service to the existing Private enterprises.

The Peace Campaign article asserts:

However, to return to the peace movement. As it has already stated, the Socialist Party welcomes its continuing development even though its shallow nature is fully realised By this is meant that it has no recognisable political base or ob­jective, simply a bland statement of peace with no further content. But in the present very backward state of affairs in Northern Ireland it is only such a movement which will be able to gain the broad base of support necessary for its success That success would be the weakening of the nationalists will to fight and the protestant reactionaries and minimising their support, This in tum would strengthen the hand of the ‘moderates’, the bourgeois demo­crats, allowing the return to a normal capitalist political democracy. Only from this position is it possible to visualise the development of a united working class in North­ern Ireland and a return to genuine class politics. And it is only this force, a united working class within either state of the territory of Ire­land which would be capable of de­feating British imperialism and a1 forms of monopoly capitalism. Then could begin the construction of a socialist state or states. When this stage of development is reached then the whole question of territorial divisions will have become irrelevant and they would eventually wither away.

There’s a wide range of other articles including one on ‘Darlings of the Western Press’ and ‘Victory for building workers’. There’s also a piece on ‘Darndale: Cutbacks cause problems’. Another piece is entitled ‘Northern Ireland: 1607-1976’. It argues:

The imponant question which faces socialists and all progressive people is how to bring about the unity of the two communities in Northern Ire­land. If one accepts reality, the answer is simple;

(1) take all possible steps to re­move the fear with which each community views the other. Immediate steps in this direction would be the introduction of a comprehensive Bill of Rights ln Northern Ireland and the deletion by the Republic of Articles Two and Three from the Constitution,

(2) the building of a common Iden­tity between the two communities . Logically, this would bemost effect­ively done by people being able to put trust in a Northern Ireland state which had agreed Institutions and which adhered to the norms of bour­geois democracy,

(3) the complete and visible separ­ation of church and state both in Northern Ireland and the Republic and the Introduction of a secular system of education in both states. Such developments would go a long way towards ensuring the develop­ment of class politics on both sides. The development of such politics and their Inevitable conclusion will determine not only the future political structures of this island, but of the whole planet.

More from Advance

Advance in the archive


Comments

No Comments yet.

Add a Comment

Formatting Help

Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:

**Bold text**
Bold text

_Italic text_
Italic text

[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link

You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution

  • By: roddy Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:37:23

    Aye, “defeating British imperialism” by allowing it to continue for a few more centuries.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: banjoagbeanjoe Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:42:00

    Really good edition of Advance. The SPI were about and active when I was in my teenage years. I wish I’d joined them. Life and politics was simpler then.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: LeftAtTheCross Tue, 22 Oct 2024 10:27:28

    In reply to banjoagbeanjoe.

    Why is that? What are the push / pull factors, contemporary or retrospective, that would make you favour them ahead of your actual historical involvement? I presume the two nations theory would feature near the top of that list?

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:42:40

    In reply to banjoagbeanjoe.

    But then you’d have been on your way to the WP via a detour. I remember being the club under hq and discovering half those around the table had been in the SPI!

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: roddy Tue, 22 Oct 2024 12:31:18

    In reply to WorldbyStorm.

    When they ditched Republicanism they became a magnet for all two nationists up to and including Paul Bew ,now Lord Bew of the Henry Jackson society.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: banjoagbeanjoe Tue, 22 Oct 2024 13:47:03

    In reply to LeftAtTheCross.

    To Latc. As Wbs said. I joined the WP in my mid twenties. A few of the members where I joined were ex-SPI. I just think my teens would have been interesting if I’d had the maturity? to join the SPI. They were an interesting bunch of lads. Can’t remember meeting any female ex-members.

    Did I read somewhere that at one stage the leadership of the SPI would offer advice to members who intended to get married – advice about the suitability of the match, from a political perspective. Am I imagining that or has anyone else heard that?

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:26:09

    In reply to roddy.

    The SPI were fascinating in a way – basically pro Soviet and two nations. Wonder how that came about. Some sort of modernity trip (it being the early 70s)Anyone know of any ex SPIers out there?

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: LeftAtTheCross Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:26:15

    In reply to banjoagbeanjoe.

    In fairness, their advice was probably more valid than what was doled out by the PP back in the day.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: banjoagbeanjoe Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:48:23

    In reply to WorldbyStorm.

    Wasn’t Colin Farrell’s da, the photographer (Éamonn?), in the SPI? Or again am I dreaming?

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:27:25

    In reply to banjoagbeanjoe.

    Hmmmm not sure

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Colm B Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:32:58

    In reply to WorldbyStorm.

    Wasn’t the SPI originally formed by people who had left Official SF? At the other end of their journey, I think they merged into the DSP.

    My experience of these two nationist ex-DSP/SPI types, who I came across in the WP/DL, was that they were actually right wing social democrats with a propensity to be quite crankish (or at least even more crankish than the rest of us).

    They played a dreadful role in advocating a pro-Serbian fascist, anti-Bosnian line in DL during the Bosnian war and of course many of them later became ardent born-again nationalists who denounced all and sundry as unionists. One of the most awful gangs of rascals I have come across on the left – up there with their frenemies in the Harris faction of the WP.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: entdinglichung Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:05:04

    did they have any international links?

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:52:17

    In reply to entdinglichung.

    That’s a good question. I understood they’d made efforts to connect with Soviets but to what extent they were successful not sure. The CPI had the franchise here so that would have been an issue.

    Reply on the CLR